Simulacra and Simulation: verschil tussen versies
Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '{{sys:dictionary:text |text=Simulacra and Simulation is most known for its discussion of symbols, signs, and how they relate to contemporaneity (simultaneous existences).[4] Baudrillard claims that current society has replaced all reality and meaning with symbols and signs, and that human experience is a simulation of reality.[5] Moreover, these simulacra are not merely mediations of reality, nor even deceptive mediations of reality; they are not based in a re…' |
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
||
| Regel 1: | Regel 1: | ||
{{sys:dictionary:text | {{sys:dictionary:text | ||
|text=Simulacra and Simulation is most known for its discussion of symbols, signs, and how they relate to contemporaneity (simultaneous existences). | |text=Simulacra and Simulation is most known for its discussion of symbols, signs, and how they relate to contemporaneity (simultaneous existences). Baudrillard claims that current society has replaced all reality and meaning with symbols and signs, and that human experience is a simulation of reality. Moreover, these simulacra are not merely mediations of reality, nor even deceptive mediations of reality; they are not based in a reality nor do they hide a reality, they simply hide that nothing like reality is relevant to people's current understanding of their lives. The simulacra that Baudrillard refers to are the significations and symbolism of culture and media that construct perceived reality, the acquired understanding by which human life and shared existence are rendered legible. (These ideas had appeared earlier in Guy Debord's 1967 The Society of the Spectacle.) Baudrillard believed that society had become so saturated with these simulacra and human life so saturated with the constructs of society that all meaning was becoming meaningless by being infinitely mutable; he called this phenomenon the "precession of simulacra".<ref name="w">Informatie afkomstig van {{#tag:easyview|{{sys:w:en}}Simulacra and Simulation|thumbnail={{sys:w:name:en}}|type=iframe}}.</ref> | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{sys:head:links}} | {{sys:head:links}} | ||
* {{#tag:easyview|{{sys:w:en}}Simulacra and Simulation|thumbnail={{sys:w:name:en}}|type=iframe}} | * {{#tag:easyview|{{sys:w:en}}Simulacra and Simulation|thumbnail={{sys:w:name:en}}|type=iframe}} | ||
Huidige versie van 11 dec 2025 om 20:54
Beschrijving
Simulacra and Simulation is most known for its discussion of symbols, signs, and how they relate to contemporaneity (simultaneous existences). Baudrillard claims that current society has replaced all reality and meaning with symbols and signs, and that human experience is a simulation of reality. Moreover, these simulacra are not merely mediations of reality, nor even deceptive mediations of reality; they are not based in a reality nor do they hide a reality, they simply hide that nothing like reality is relevant to people's current understanding of their lives. The simulacra that Baudrillard refers to are the significations and symbolism of culture and media that construct perceived reality, the acquired understanding by which human life and shared existence are rendered legible. (These ideas had appeared earlier in Guy Debord's 1967 The Society of the Spectacle.) Baudrillard believed that society had become so saturated with these simulacra and human life so saturated with the constructs of society that all meaning was becoming meaningless by being infinitely mutable; he called this phenomenon the "precession of simulacra".[1]
| Bronnen, noten en/of referenties: |
|